Take Silence Is Agreement

2. Immediately after this meeting, the Secretariat shall issue a provisional text of the decision, without number and with a temporary title, taking into account the fact that the decision is subject to a silence procedure. The provisional text is attached to the journal of this meeting. a silence procedure or a tacit acceptance procedure[1] (in French: tacit approval procedure); Latin: who tacet consent videtur, “he who is silent is brought to agreement”, “silence implies/means consent”) is a means of formally adopting texts, often, but not exclusively in the international political context. How can you prevent this? Define an important fundamental rule: “Silence means agreement” or “who tacet consent empty”, as has been known for centuries. A draft text will be distributed to participants who have the last opportunity to propose changes or additions to the text. If no amendment is proposed before the expiry of the time limit for the procedure (if no one “breaks the silence”), the text is considered adopted by all interested parties. Often, this procedure is the last step in the adoption of the text, after the basic premises of the text have been agreed in previous negotiations. “Breaking the silence” is only a last resort if a participant still has fundamental problems with certain parts of the text and is therefore the exception rather than the rule. The maxim is “Who tacet consents”: the maxim of the law is “silence gives consent”. So if you want to do the math of what my silence did, you have to calculate that I agreed.

Moreover, German/English is not the only language to have this sentence. I know very well that there is a Russian expression which, literally translated into English, sounds much like this: “Silence is a sign of convergence”. Of course. There is the phrase “silence is consent”, sometimes called “silence implies consent” or “silence is consent”. 4. If silence has not been broken, the Chairperson shall inform the participants in writing, immediately after the expiry of the period of silence, that the decision in question has been taken. The text of the decision will not be published before the next meeting. If urgent administrative measures need to be taken on the basis of this Decision, the President may forward the text of the decision to a competent executive structure only for internal use. Sometimes, the establishment and strengthening of “silence means convergence” as a basic rule is enough to sink opinions. But if you feel that some participants still find it difficult to express themselves freely, you should consider the following tactics that allow for expressing perspectives in a way that focuses on the ideas and not the individuals who express them. Wikipedia is huge and our editors` time is limited.

At all times, there is a lot of open discussion on many different topics throughout the project. We encourage our writers to be bold and it is very likely that you will eventually be affected by the outcome of a decision that you knew nothing about or did not have the chance to join. If a decision is based primarily on silence, it is especially important to remember that consensus can change. . A proposal with strong support is considered adopted, unless a member objects to it before a specific time frame: silence means consent – or at least tolerance. This procedure is based on the fact that a member of a minority fears that the opposition will expose him to accusations of obstruction and, therefore, to the risk of isolation. The silence procedure is applied by NATO, the OSCE, within the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union (EU) and undoubtedly in many other international for a. [2] Most bosses think that if people ask for feedback directly, they express their thoughts openly and directly.

Comments are closed.